Elect Hilary for War! yeai, Another Georg W Bush is coming,
What Hilary stands for:
1. Not for women rights, other than using it to gain votes,
2. Not to control the cooperate lobby as she was created by them.
3. Not for diplomacy by peaceful means, as her doctrine is to use US military strength to go to war anywhere in the world to enforce its hegemony and compensate for diminishing status world wide.
4. Not for stability as she is for using US thuggery to control maritime trade in the oceans in Asia and take control of the resources to sustain US military industrial complex in the long run.
5. Not for a multi polar world as she is not for recognizing global south as equal partners in global politics.
6. Not for democracy as her strategy is to bomb in the name of democracy, like in Iraq and Libya.
The last thing US needs is a political clone of the Nazi banker Bush family.
What Hilary stands for:
1. Not for women rights, other than using it to gain votes,
2. Not to control the cooperate lobby as she was created by them.
3. Not for diplomacy by peaceful means, as her doctrine is to use US military strength to go to war anywhere in the world to enforce its hegemony and compensate for diminishing status world wide.
4. Not for stability as she is for using US thuggery to control maritime trade in the oceans in Asia and take control of the resources to sustain US military industrial complex in the long run.
5. Not for a multi polar world as she is not for recognizing global south as equal partners in global politics.
6. Not for democracy as her strategy is to bomb in the name of democracy, like in Iraq and Libya.
The last thing US needs is a political clone of the Nazi banker Bush family.
Read this: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/11/20/hillarys-war-whoop/
I was wondering,
ReplyDeleteI'm Sick and tired of two things, 1. US presidential election, 2. people outside US act like whats good for the Hegemony is good for the world and repeat the arguments that US media teaches them.
I will never be able to live with Hilary 2016, Why? She will use Military force to compensate the traditional threat pose by multi polar world to the US Hegemony. She will also expand what she started (Killing people and call it a victory for HR) as the Secretary of State. In This context She is more dangerous than Trump as she will trigger less global outrage against US.
So If US hegemony cant get to the soft hands of Bernie, its better to have it on some one who would help rest of the world to mobilize against the US hegemony, (In a way Bush did in his last years). Hilary will also mainstream the corporate globalization and provide it with firm ideological grounds to operate in to perpetuity. She would also provide a sheep's clothing to the real wolf underneath.
This is why I Cant live with Hilary 2016. So If US Hegemony is not going to the soft hands of Bernie, Then It should go for trump. Why, If we cant have a softer Hegemony then its better to have a Hegemony that would trigger a global mobilization for increasing speed of the Hegemonic downfall.