Sunday, October 4, 2015

Prediction: Syrian end game for Russia



DRAFT: Prediction: Syrian end game for Russia


Many pundits are talking about what Russia want out of Syria and what should the self proclaimed global pioneers of Human right defenders in the west should do to save the last great hope of global stability, (west claim that their bombs bring democracy and social justice and do not kill any civilians, any civilians killed because they were in the wrong place,..). I think it’s my time for me to join the bandwagon and say what I think would happen. 

Here is what I think would happen with Russian intervention,



1.       Russia and pro Syrian Government forces would try their best to neutralize any opposition forces posing immediate threats to their urban and military centers holding their political grip.
a.       This would be done so that they can have a breathing space for their battle fatigue security personnel, (para-military and national army).
b.      To prevent major urban and military centers from falling to any opposition groups including Islamist terrorist groups.
c.       To simplify the battle front and strengthen areas under Government control to support the operations against armed groups including Islamist terrorist groups.
d.      To free up much needed troops and fire power to support their operations to achieve bigger military objectives in the future.
e.      Not to allow armed opposition group to operate in any consistent way in Syrian territory so that international players who do not support Syrian Government but has a agenda against ISIS has no foot hall in Syria against ISIS outside Syrian Government. 



2.       Russian and Syrian air power would slowly take out major logistical centers allowing them to monitor the behaviors of groups like ISIS and Al Nusra. 

a.       To keep ISIS and Al Nusra in a relatively stabilized front giving breathing space for groups forces of Syrian Government and its allies to neutralize any other military threat.
b.      To create an argument for international audience to support the narrative of the pro Russian intervention agenda to easily justify their operations against CIA trained military assets that are immediate threats to the Syrian Government.


3.       A stronger Military force with joint operations command with large number of battle hardened troops that are supported by a significant portion of the Syrian population living in Syrian territories would carry out a systematic attack on bigger military and political threats like ISIS and Al Nusra. 

a.       International community and other parties to the Syrian conflict would be given two simple choices, Syrian Government or Total destruction of Middle East makeup by terrorist Caliph in Syria and Iraq.
b.      The joint air power would have absolute air superiority over battle areas and will be able to deny the ability to operate freely on the ground without a substantial risk of being detected. This deny of movement would be a huge problem for operational mobility for any enemy forces.
c.       Syrian Government would be in an better position to carry out calculated military operations to further boost the morale of the battle tired government and para-military forces.
d.      To gain the confidence of the local Syrian population as the alternative to Islamist rule over Syria.
e.      To gain the confidence of the certain elements of the international community as the alternative to Islamist rule over Syria.
f.        Significant fire power, both ground and Air-Navel would be made available to open up multiple fronts against ISIS and Al Nusra and associated terrorists pushing them to fight the pro Syrian Government forces as a conventional military power draining their resources including Human power and logistical flexibility.


I personally don’t know how this would be playing out, and would be interesting to see what other people think of this. As a person who has substantial grass root level understanding how wars are fought, I think it’s too early to say how exactly things would happen and what would be the result, but points given above covers many things to come.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015



Response to Daham Sirisena,

Dear Daham, 


I'm going to respond to your face book comment as the person who designed the National UN youth delegate program of Sri Lanka to include democratically selected youth delegates to UN processes. And also as a person who supported and worked actively to support your father to become the president. I agree with you that the first family is invited to UNGA and you represent the country. In this context I wish to bring this to your attention. 


1. Namal Rajapakse did the same and claimed it was positive to the country.

2. And UN major group on youth and children had a Sri Lankan representation before that were selected in a national program and was known in UN system to be one of the most effective processes for selecting youth delegates.

3. When Sri Lanka has a National Youth Services Council that is the only authority to select youth delegate in a mutually developed process with International agencies, it is wrong that you forcibly represent Sri Lankan young people.

4. You may think you got something back to Sri Lanka, but you just made your father a laughing stock and embarrassed our country by becoming a self proclaimed youth delegate.

5. What you should have been doing is that allow our official national UN youth delegates selected every year to seat where you were seating and become an ambassador to their work.

6. Don’t put a UN youth delegate program respected world wide to the coffin by overstepping your role as a member of our first family. Then Ministry of Youth affairs and National Youth Services Council developed this program so that people in power or with money cannot represent our young people and Sri Lankan youth can decide who will be representing them.

7. If you have a issue with what I’m telling you please read that the youth in post 2015 development agenda decision making or simply go to the UN youth delegate program.

8. Before you come and claim you represented us in an illegitimate way lot of rich kids from Colombo with parents with deep pockets wanted to represent Sri Lanka in telling the world they are important. There were forces in the then government also wanted to put the friends of then president’s son in to representing us. But finally we didn’t allow them to, and we work very hard under a very difficult situation to make a democratic process to have real young people represent young people of our country. 


My recommendation: 


1.      Support the UN supported youth agenda carried out by the National Youth Services Council and be a supporting person to the UN youth delegate program. (Don’t think you can do it by becoming the youth delegate yourself).

2.      Go take an effort to meet the current UN youth delegate and the once from last year and talk to them about the UN SDG youth agenda and how you can help them do their job.

If you are willing to make a real effort we will support you in our hearts and mind, but if you try to do the same thing what Namal did before you, if would oppose you in the same way we oppose Namal.